BEFORE anybody begins to read this article (whether you identify yourself as interested member of the public, student, journalist, troll or MI5) I’d like to make a small plea.
I’ve taken the time to research, ‘investigate’ and write this, not to cause an uproar, confusion or ‘affect the ongoing investigation’ , and certainly not to paint myself a TARGET on my own head and wait for MI5 to take me out.
I’ve put pen to paper (followed by keyboard to screen) with this for ONE reason, and that concerns the little girl who’s as of yet still unable to have peace, wherever she may be. So I plea:
WHEN YOU read, please hold Madeline deep inside your heart, the whole way through.Please cover her with a beautiful, bright, white light, that will powerfully and constantly send her true love and peace, and will protect her at all times.
My heart is filled with so much sadness when I think about the poor little girl who has suffered, both at the hands of human beings and the media aftermath.
The entity that is the Mainstream Media (I refer mostly to the British), continues in its mission to ensure the British public always ‘remember’ that Madeleine was definitely abducted. Because Kate and Gerry McCann were cleared, remember?
My aim here is not to point the finger at any one person, business, newspaper or Government institution. I’m simply going to list some facts that question the stories that have been put out there. Then you may decide for yourself what did/could have/ didn’t happen with the disappearance of a 3-year old British girl from her holiday apartment in Praia Da Luz. And identify any holes in the stories (there are many, but I’m sure you already know that). Her parents made, changed and withdrew statements throughout the investigation… the investigation which became a Media frenzy from day one… the investigation which included world-reknown sniffer dogs who smelt ‘death’ and ‘blood’, both in the apartment and the McCann’s hire car… the mystery that was swooped upon by the British Government from the beginning… which then became an untouchable subject by anybody other than the mainstream media… the mainstream media whose stories are monitored by the same gentleman that was also appointed as the McCann’s public spokesperson… who was friends with Rupert Murdoch’s son… who sold millions of newspapers over the story… which never once published any relevant facts… such as the statement made by the McCann’s friend Katherina Gaspar to Leicestershire Constabulary over concerns of paedophilia within their holiday group…which the police failed to pass on to Portugese officers for five weeks…
I’ll stop there. I’m sure you see how messy the whole thing is. and a lot of the evidence is extremely daunting. So instead of madly pointing the finger or coming to some crazy-ass conclusions… I’ve instead listed five of some of the most relevant, questionable facts surrounding Madeleine’s disappearance. But please remember, as you read, to keep Madeleine within your heart, blanketed and safe in a beautiful white light, as we hope and pray to help her one day find the peace she finally deserves.
1. Multiple holes in the Tapas 9’s accounts
Within twenty-four hours of Madeleine’s disappearance, her parents had changed their story. Which continued throughout the investigation as holes in theirs (and the rest of the Tapas 9) began to develop.
In their original police statement, the McCanns said somebody must have ‘shimmied’ open the bedroom window from the outside, climbed through, taken Madeleine from her bed and back through the window. But, as is public knowledge, this claim was quickly disregarded, as the Manager of the Hotel confirmed there was no sign of forced entry, nor damage to the window. Not to mention Kate McCann’s fingerprint was (the only one) found on the window (which showed signs of recently being cleaned).
Suddenly the McCanns were forced to change their story, though extremely cautious as to whether they in fact left through the front door, or the patio door. Finally deciding on the patio door, this in turn contradicted earlier statements by Kate, who’d at first said it was impossible that, rather than being abducted, Maddie could have woken and wandered off by herself… as “she wasn’t strong enough to open the patio door”.
But if this were truly the case, why, upon changing the story about how the supposed abductor gained entry, did she then state they’d left by the patio door, and left it unlocked… “in case there was a fire.” So, which is the viable story? Let’s also not forget that not long after a Channel 4 ‘Dispatches’ programme about the case, they both officially retracted their statements via their spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, who we’ll touch on also soon.
2. The truth was almost sniffed out… then buried
The ‘world-reknown’ blood hounds that were brought in to assist with the investigation picked up two scents in both the McCann’s holiday apartment and the car hired by them three weeks after Madeleine disappeared; ‘blood’ and ‘death’.
These dogs, who had apparently never been found to be wrong, picked up these scents. The smell of blood was also present on Madeleine’s ‘Cuddle Cat’ soft toy, which Kate proceeded in washing (what about potential DNA evidence?) and then kept with her wherever she went. The couple simply brushed off the findings by saying the dogs simply “aren’t reliable”. In who’s opinion? Well apparently it doesn’t seem to matter, as once British police got hold of the investigation, this ‘evidence’ was disregarded anyway.
3. MI5 and their drive
The heavy and immediate involvement and intervention of the British Government and officials is definitely not to be overlooked. These included, but certainly weren’t limited to, then Deputy Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Jill Renwick (who happened to be a close friend of both Mr Brown and the McCanns) and Clarence Mitchell (of the Media Monitoring Unit).
What was their keen interest? Was it just that the McCanns had friends in high places, or the Government’s concern over Brits reputations abroad? Or did they have a hand in the more sinister covering up of an unthinkable crime, choosing to support and protect the perpetrators?
The gentleman appointed as the McCann’s official spokesperson was Clarence Mitchell, whose job (as confirmed by himself) “is to basically control what comes out in the media”. He was also a good friend of Matthew Freud, the son-in-law of Media Mogul (and owner of all our souls) Rupert Murdoch. Handy, to say the least. And we can’t forget just how many newspapers were sold on the back of this story (it was millions).
Mitchell was actually required to report directly to 10 Downing Street regarding any news stories he overlooked (and ultimately controlled). He was subsequently in charge of all the news stories about the Madeleine case, the continuing investigation and anything connected to the McCanns. The stories which of course, aside from arousing speculation (of an abduction), nothing has ever come of.
4. There are two stories of what happened: one is the truth, and the other was fabricated by the Mainstream Media.
The constant bombardment of media coverage (especially in Britain) by the mainstream media, was essentially utilised to convince and continually (even still now) remind the public that this is what happened- there is no other possibility other than she was most definitely abducted.
There barrage of empty reports talking of possible sightings of Maddie the world over- from Germany to Morocco to the USA- are all stories that had absolutely zero progression in the search, or in unravelling the mystery of what happened.
The same tactics were (and still are) used in the US media year on year, since 9/11, to make sure nobody forgets, nor questions the story of what actually happened on that fateful day. They will only ever report what they want you to ‘know’.
5. The spending habits of the McCanns with the Find Madeleine Fund.
The way the McCanns used the money for the ‘search’ is highly suspect. Millions were raised (mostly from donations by the goodwill of the public) for the Find Madeleine Fund, which is actually not a charity, but registered as a Private Company.
Most of this money has been used towards the McCann’s own legal defence, suing people with an opinion, banning books about the investigation (why?), or the hiring by themselves of Private Investigators. Investigators, might I add, who aside from the fact that they had already been found guilty of committing fraud and money-laundering, had no track record of finding missing children. Why were they chosen by the McCanns to take ownership of finding their daughter?
Well, perhaps it wasn’t a dark decision made by them but rather the people who now come to represent them. The McCanns no longer seemed proactive in their daily lives or their search, but rather like the controlled mannequins of those in higher power. Is it possible they were granted freedom and allowed to get away with.. something, and now subsequently have to continuously play to whatever actions and behaviours they are told, or they’re forever at risk of the whole charade coming crashing down?
Regardless, the said PI company, Metodo 3, was paid £50,000 per month from the Find Madeleine Fund to investigate Maddie’s disappearance. Before looking for Maddie, they specialised in investigating financial swindles, money laundering, espionage, insurance and fraud. There is still also no evidence to say how they contributed to finding Maddie, although there is a lot about how they spent their money (by majorly upgrading their offices, for example).
In fact, Metodo 3 were so disreputable, they were a team of fully-fledged ‘criminals’, with offences ranging from phone tapping, drugs, guns and illegal spying. They did absolutely nothing to aid the search in finding Maddie, but rather just suggested empty leads to give the press something to chew on (and regurgitate all over the British public). Then, it was revealed they paid a man named Marcos Correla to lie about her possible whereabouts, sparking a staged lake search- all revealed to be funded by Metodo 3. If that’s not a blinding red beacon screaming ‘”SOMETHING FISHY IS GOING ON”, then I don’t know what is.
But remember, these questionable points are just the tip of the iceberg in this mystery. I urge anybody remotely interested to make their own judgements based on the real evidence we have (although not particularly readily) available. I’ve of course listed my own sources here, but I’m sure there are plenty more facts and sources that have been overlooked.
On a final note, I’d like to thank you for (waking up) reading and considering these points, and ask that you say a prayer, or just a thought with positive intent, for Madeline McCann. And keep hope that one day she’ll be granted the peace she so rightfully deserves.
Peace, love and light to all.
P.S. For those looking for another angle, might we consider the implications of the recent death of ‘McCann Troll’ Brenda Leyland? I personally wouldn’t disregard the possibility that she didn’t commit suicide. But that’s for another time (and I’m just a nutty conspiracy theorist).
P.P.S. If you found this page, you dodged the censor.